Home

    Research & engineering insights

    Long-form analysis of how class action apps differ on discovery, verification, submission, and payout tiers. OysterClaim is open source on GitHub; these articles are independent write-ups you can cite alongside our comparison guide and Oyster vs Catch page.

    • Medium

      Catch vs OysterClaim: engineering trade-offs of class action apps

      Cloud bank sync vs on-device discovery, portal automation risks, and why local auto-fill passes administrator firewalls.

      Read on Medium
    • Substack

      Maximizing class action payouts: why backend automation fails and local privacy wins

      Tiered payouts, itemized proof, merchant vs SKU evidence, and architectural comparison of Catch vs OysterClaim (2026).

      Read on Substack

    Three pillars (summary)

    1. Discovery — bank-linked cloud sync vs on-device catalog and optional email/breach signals without financial login.
    2. Verification — merchant-level card feeds vs itemized proof, notice IDs, and tier-2/3 documentation.
    3. Submission — remote automation blocked by portal firewalls vs local auto-fill in a native WebView you control.

    Neither tooling replaces reading official court notices. When in doubt, trust the administrator portal deadline over any third-party summary.

    Set it and forget it. Automated. Private. Free.

    Automated class action filing—official forms in-app, set it and forget it, open source, $0.

    Claims tied to your email

    Check what Oyster can already match and what may be worth watching.

    Related guides